Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, the chief posek for the Charedi non Chassidic community, especially in Israel, issued the following ruling in 2004 in Yeshurun. The translation below is from Rabbi Dr Asher Lipner. The original question and answer is here.
BS”D Fast of the Tenth (Month) 5764
To my friend etc. Rabbi Shraga Feivel Cohen etc.
I received his letter in its time and was unable to respond until “a day on which scholars take a holiday.” The essence of the letter: one knows that someone is sexually abusing a boy or a girl in a manner in which we are incapable of stopping him from continuing his evil deeds, is it permissible to report such a matter to a government official?
This is the language of the Rashba (Rabbi Shlomo ben Aderet, Spain, 1235-1310, one of the foremost authorities in Jewish law) in his Responsa, III no. 393, “It appears to me that if the witnesses are believed by the selected judges, [these judges] are permitted to impose a monetary fine or corporal punishment, all in accord with their evaluation; and this maintains society. Because if you will adjudicate based only on the laws established by the Torah, society will be destroyed… And, therefore, those judges who did this, if they saw that the situation required [such action] for communal welfare, they acted legally, and certainly when they have been authorized by the government (to impose such punishment)…”
From the words of the Rashba we learn that in matters that concern societal welfare the Sages of Israel of every generation have the authority to make fences (to extend their authority and decide matters according to their best judgment) and to stand in the breach, even without government authorization. And concerning that which the Rashba wrote in his novel insights to Baba Metzia (84b) implies that this is (based on) governmental authority: “If they say to him ‘Arrest him,’ and we are dealing in a case in which there are no witnesses or forewarning and in which there is no Sanhedrin (Supreme Court that has the authority to impose capital punishment) [and therefore according to strict Jewish law a Jewish Court cannot convict such a person], this case is different because they (the members of the Jewish Court) are agents of the king (government) and the king’s law allows for capital punishment even without witnesses and forewarning, in order to discipline the world…” Accordingly, in matters of societal welfare it is not necessary to receive prior governmental approval.
The permission to report (an abuser) to the government is when one is certain that he transgressed, in this there is benefit to society. However, when there is no substance or foundation [to the allegation] but merely a dimyon (presumption), if we would allow (reports to the government) not only is this not for societal welfare, but this is societal destruction. It is possible that [a student may make false allegations] because of some bitterness that the student holds against the teacher or for some meaningless presumption that causes a person to think that his death is better than life—through no fault of [the teacher]. I do not see any permission in the matter.
Yosef Shalom Elyashiv
Rav Elyashiv’s willingness to permit cooperation with authorities diminishes when it comes to parental abuse of children. This has to do with the concern that the child will be removed from the parental home and given to a foster family that is either xtian or secular. “There is no doubt that this would harm the soul of the child, even if for a short while,” in such a situation, R’ Elyashiv stated that qualified Rabbis must be consulted in each case of parental abuse.
None of the above is new. What is new, however, is the recent Charedi Agudas Yisrael pronouncement:
But at a panel discussion titled “Molestation Issues and Reporting: Current Halachic Thinking,” the panel’s leader, Rabbi Shlomo Gottesman, cautioned that Elyashiv never explained what constitutes “reasonable suspicion.” To establish this, Gottesman said, a person should consult a rabbi “who has experience in these issues” before going to secular authorities.
“If [the rabbi] thinks reasonable suspicion has been met, then you would be allowed to overcome mesirah and report,” said Gottesman, a board member of Torah Umesorah, the National Society for Hebrew Day Schools.
Rabbi David Zwiebel, Agudah’s executive vice president, told the conference that even mandated reporters — teachers, social workers and people in certain other professions who are required by law to promptly report any suspected cases of sexual abuse — should consult a rabbi before going to the police.
This qualification by Agudas Yisrael brings us back to square one! In fact, it might be worse because even they acknowledge that nobody knows who the so-called qualified Rabbis are, Rabbi Yosef Blau of Yeshivah University, who was originally involved in the ill-fated case involving the guilty Baruch Lanner stated:
“There is no decent justification why anybody in their right mind should think rabbis are qualified to make that judgment”
Indeed, check out this recent farcical case in Lakewood, where the Beis Din had to call a social worker to make the detemination and wasn’t even available to later hear what the social worker had unearthed!
Agudas Yisrael’s pronouncement has caused justifiable consternation (see also here).
Melbourne has its share of alleged predators, some of whom walk around in our community with impunity. Yes, it is true that in most cases victims will not formally go to a court of law and press charges. I am not here to judge them. However, I do have the following question, which is bothering me.
If I am a Rabbi, and I have undergone specialist training on abuse and I have seen victims who have testified to me about crimes a Melbourne predator has allegedly committed, and I believe those victims but I cannot convince the victims to go to the police, would I do everything in my power to make sure that those alleged predators
- are not given opportunities to address youth in our community
- are not able to sit on boards of community organisations
Sadly, in our own Melbourne community, there are alleged predators who continue to speak to our youth in both formal and informal manners presenting as some sort of “expert” as well as alleged predators who continue to sit on the boards of community organisations. Should those people be encouraged to remove themselves from such positions? The predators need to seek help. They need to admit what they have done and be under a supervised treatment regimen. We must protect society in whatever way we can. Some of these predators masquerade as if they never perpetrated any crime.
Surely, if we can’t get victims to press charges, removing alleged predators from positions of power or influence is the least we can do to protect the vulnerable ones in society?
Rabbi Mark Dratch of JSafe is a source of inspiration.
as is Dr Asher Lipner
Perhaps it’s time to open up a Melbourne Chapter of JSafe?
pitputim 
Pandora’s box will be opened very soon in certain kehilos in Melbourne. The key is in the lock & turning. Predators, & all those who have covered up for them: beware.
LikeLike
But will they be sent to Israel with free ticket?
LikeLike
yeh but what if the sicko is an expert in locks and keys and knows how to get around this as indeed one long time sicko of melb is
LikeLike
Well done Isaac, the speeches by the Rabbis were fantastic. They are man enough to deal with this issue in a responsible manner..
En passant, when is the child molester of the Adass school going to be extradited from Israel to face charges?
The real question is, “What makes a Rabbi an expert in anything?” Unless that Rabbi holds an internationally recognized qualification in a given field, there is no recognized expertise by definition. For example, I believe Rabbi Dr Abraham Twersky has greater expertise in helping dealing with people empathetically than the Rebbe with the same surname in New Square.
LikeLike
Pinchus, if no-one testifies she cannot be charged. And very unfortunately I understand why. (The parent’s similar mentality as that of Square, NK etc.) We need some lessons in ethics, morality and being able to think a bit for ourselves and not follow the base mentality most have aquired.
LikeLike
Steven, isn’t it a sad indictment on a significant number of Jewish sects, that the focus is on education deprivation, the messianic apocalypse, and the veneration of undeserving religious leaders. The study of ethics, and training in the capacity to think, would be a threat to those in power.
LikeLike
Emotional blackmail is used to terrorize witnesses into silence and, silence is complicity. Here is the typical scenario: a parent whose child is victimized shares their trauma and pain with the school or relevant communal authorities.The authorities are genuinely horrified and have rachmanas for the victims. They offer to provide help in the form of counselling or any needed treatments, on one condition. The parent must agree to a vow of silence. The authorities explain politely that while they feel the victim’s pain, the damage to to mosod/community that would ensue should the news of this shonda become public would be immense. They are told that their silence is for the good of the community.
Some parents buy this line, but others do not. They argue that these perpetrators must be punished according to civil law to prevent them from offending again. Those who protest are then dealt with a bit more harshly. They are told that if they speak out they will suffer certain consequences such as being ostracized from the community. Perhaps they will be denied aliyahs in shule, or be taken off certain committees etc. Meanwhile, no such threats are made to the perpetrator, especially if the abuser happens to be a ‘respected’ member of the kehillah or has familial or financial ties to others with such status.
Those parents who insist or persist is demanding justice are then threatened with the most terrifying threat of all: their precious children will be branded for life and will not get shidduchim. This is usually enough to stifle the protestations of even the most aggrieved parents who weigh the pros and cons and decide that it is best for all concerned and reluctantly keep their peace.
LikeLike
“….are then threatened with…. their… children will be branded for life and will not get shidduchim”
The reality is that most times it has nothing to do with threats or being told. The great majority of times-by charedim and many modern orthodox-it is the parents(and the victims) themselves who refuse to go to the authorities, because of stigma for shidduchim. It’s damned if you do and ditto if you don’t.
Yes, there are some who do, but they are a very small minority. In a more promiscuous society there is less or maybe no stigma, so reporting is not really a problem. It is different when society is built on Torah values and Shidduchim are checked out.
And this refusal to report by the latter families ain’t gonna go away. Nothing’s going to change it, and for very good reasons. This stigma issue has been going on for thousands of years, and the Torah speaks very clearly about it-although regarding rape of a woman. The victim there is given power over the man: she decides if she wants to marry him(due to shidduchim problems from stigma of being raped), he has no say whatsoever. He can never divorce her and the Mishna says that she gets a very handsome payout: for about 5 different sufferings.
Of course what the Torah says about rape is not applicable here. However, it does address the issue of stigma in that case.I don’t know what the answer here is, other than taking things into our own hands and beating these disgusting evil monsters black and blue.. It has been done!
LikeLike