I’m amazed at Dr Cardozo’s latest piece. You can read it. I found it facile. I will summarise my reaction
- We are the people of the book. It is called the Torah. It can’t be “read” away. It is immutable.
- There purposely has always been an oral component, handed down at Sinai. We don’t need Plato for the insight of reading and understanding.
- The text is called HAGODO which means “telling/saying”. In other words, the point is dialogue. The text is the starting point. Not having a locus to commence from leads to the neo style evenings which turn Pesach into yet another commemoration of the Holocaust, something Rav Soloveitchik railed against vociferously. The left will of course humanise the story of Jews and turn it into “the evening of social justice” where we commemorate Darfur, Slavery, and what have you. Sorry. This is about Yetzias Mitzrayim which is indelibly woven both rationally and Kabbalistically with Matan Torah. Matan Torah is what it’s all about. The former, Pesach, is the journey.
- Reading doesn’t require verbalising. The Hagodo does as he notes, but doesn’t amplify
- Rebbi Yehuda Hanosi wasn’t concerned with pharmakon! He was concerned that the oral discussions not be lost. Learning Gemora is the quintessential exercise in trying to piece together any contradictory mesoras that were transmitted
- I’m not at all clear what Dr Cardozo’s message means in the context of an audience that doesn’t understand the basics of what was written, and to expand that into dialogue. As I alluded to above, this is not ab nihilo. The Baal Hagodo gave us a starting point. If one isn’t even at the level of the starting point, then the starting point becomes exactly what should be taught this year, so that new insights are introduced in the following year. The beginning is most definitely reading and more reading and more reading. We most definitely do start from a point. It is called Mesora.

Sounds to me that you are pretty much agreeing with the gist of what he is saying, despite his use of different metaphors to express it.
LikeLike
I do not understand your conclusion in the slightest
LikeLike